![]() S3 is the de facto standard for object storage now, so I'd personally like to see it leave the exclusive control of AWS and be managed by an independent standards body of some kind. The growth potential for Backblaze here is immense, and I look forward to seeing how they cope with increased demand. ![]() It's much easier for those that are developers to support one API (albeit with a few variations) than many different ones. It makes Backblaze much more accessible to a huge number of customers that aren't developers. "I really think that this this will be transformative for us in supporting all sorts of use cases and all sorts of customers out there," said Budman.Īdding the S3 interface makes sense to me. By adding an S3 interface layer, Backblaze has made its B2 service compatible with the broad range of software that already supports S3, and joins a broad ecosystem of other S3-compatible storage providers. "What we found was that, sure, developers can write to it, but the bulk of people out there are not developers."īackblaze had been telling customers to pressure their software vendors to support the Backblaze B2 API, and many did, but it seems the customer pressure finally became too great. ![]() "We were assuming that developers were going to write to the API," Budman said. Backblaze is famous for sharing, in great detail, the process of designing, building, and using its Backblaze Storage Pods and its regular disk reliability reports are highly anticipated by storage nerds everywhere.īackblaze had resisted calls to add an S3 compatible API for its B2 storage service, launched five years ago, despite considerable popularity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |